PowerArchiver Home

  #1  
Old 02-14-2009, 10:47 PM
deity deity is offline
PA Super User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 58
Thanks: 3
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
PowerArchiver Outlook Plug-in

Why in settings absent ultra 7 zip compression?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-15-2009, 07:42 AM
spwolf's Avatar
spwolf spwolf is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 7,820
Thanks: 676
Thanked 207 Times in 192 Posts
because it takes 800 MB of RAM :-)
__________________
ConeXware, Inc.
latest PA release info on Facebook, Twitter | Follow us and win free PowerArchiver.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-17-2009, 01:49 AM
deity deity is offline
PA Super User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 58
Thanks: 3
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by spwolf View Post
because it takes 800 MB of RAM :-)
On modern PC 2-4GB or more RAM...800 MB is not really problem.
And if it text document with PA smart option it would use in common cases PPMD with ~200MB

Last edited by deity; 02-17-2009 at 01:51 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-10-2009, 08:16 AM
davidsplash davidsplash is offline
PA Super User
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: london
Posts: 1,226
Thanks: 0
Thanked 29 Times in 26 Posts
It is for my system. They need to use a standard as most internet providers like bt in the uk only allow 20mb max of attachments. So what is the need for this on outlook attachments.

To think about
I have to confess i only have 320mb of ram and a large virtual memory file, as my computer is a dell 10 yes old and still working, on a windows 2000 system.
That is the average for most computers in developing worlds and people who can't afford to get a new one yet.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-10-2009, 11:55 AM
TBGBe's Avatar
TBGBe TBGBe is offline
Still Mainly Lurking
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,151
Thanks: 6
Thanked 102 Times in 94 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidsplash View Post
... They need to use a standard as most internet providers like bt in the uk only allow 20mb max of attachments. So what is the need for this on outlook attachments.
The 800 MB is required ram use to perform the compression (7zip) - not the size of the resulting email attachment(s).
__________________
Terry

WinXP SP3
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-10-2009, 12:04 PM
spwolf's Avatar
spwolf spwolf is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 7,820
Thanks: 676
Thanked 207 Times in 192 Posts
in most cases difference is minimal on small files, and hence there is no need for it in email client.

Unless people start sending emails which are several hundred MB in size, which is unlikely.
__________________
ConeXware, Inc.
latest PA release info on Facebook, Twitter | Follow us and win free PowerArchiver.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-11-2009, 02:34 AM
davidsplash davidsplash is offline
PA Super User
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: london
Posts: 1,226
Thanks: 0
Thanked 29 Times in 26 Posts
i was merlry making a point that larger file sizes would result in more ram being used and that it is not really needed
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.