PowerArchiver Home

  #1  
Old 04-13-2008, 04:55 AM
davidsplash davidsplash is offline
PA Super User
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: london
Posts: 1,226
Thanks: 0
Thanked 29 Times in 26 Posts
Password Recovery Software

Zip Key 8.3 build 2867

Does not support zip encryption that is the same as winzip's made by powerarchiver. However the same aes zip from winzip can be recovered.

This make powerarchiver more secure than winzip in aes encryption? even though it is compatiable with winzips aes encryption
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-13-2008, 04:26 PM
spwolf's Avatar
spwolf spwolf is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 7,820
Thanks: 676
Thanked 207 Times in 192 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidsplash View Post
Zip Key 8.3 build 2867

Does not support zip encryption that is the same as winzip's made by powerarchiver. However the same aes zip from winzip can be recovered.

This make powerarchiver more secure than winzip in aes encryption? even though it is compatiable with winzips aes encryption
any encryption can be broken with brute force attacks...
__________________
ConeXware, Inc.
latest PA release info on Facebook, Twitter | Follow us and win free PowerArchiver.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-13-2008, 04:55 PM
spwolf's Avatar
spwolf spwolf is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 7,820
Thanks: 676
Thanked 207 Times in 192 Posts
so basically, PA does not create WZ AES archives, it creates PKZIP AES archives for full compatibility with zip standards.

Pk AES implementation is a bit more complex to implement and no code for it is available online like for WZ AES, so thats why that software does not support it currently.

However, AES encryption is very secure, in both WZ or PK standards.

Select nice combination of letters, numbers and some characters such as .=(/&%%$$#""!)($ and it would take an century to decrypt.

PAE is the same with added benefit that you need to decrypt the complete file to see if password is good or bad, so that makes complete brute force attack a lot slower.

In any case, unless encryption is broken (such as zip 2.0 encryption), with good password, it is almost impossible to brute force it.
__________________
ConeXware, Inc.
latest PA release info on Facebook, Twitter | Follow us and win free PowerArchiver.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-14-2008, 01:17 PM
davidsplash davidsplash is offline
PA Super User
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: london
Posts: 1,226
Thanks: 0
Thanked 29 Times in 26 Posts
wouldn't it be an idea to allow both aes zip formats so that people can have two methods of creating this archive.

i mean so you can great aes archive at zipping and after it has been originally zipped.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-14-2008, 01:32 PM
spwolf's Avatar
spwolf spwolf is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 7,820
Thanks: 676
Thanked 207 Times in 192 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidsplash View Post
wouldn't it be an idea to allow both aes zip formats so that people can have two methods of creating this archive.

i mean so you can great aes archive at zipping and after it has been originally zipped.
that doesnt have anything to do with creation of aes archive after zipping...

there is no reason to complicate things for users when it comes to different standards, as all the software supports reading both (good ones like wz, wr, pkzip, etc)...
__________________
ConeXware, Inc.
latest PA release info on Facebook, Twitter | Follow us and win free PowerArchiver.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.