PowerArchiver Home

  #1  
Old 08-17-2005, 10:56 PM
PAFuser PAFuser is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 14
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
support for RK and PAQ archives.

read this for paq
link for winrk archiver
archiver/compression test and comparison

someone recommended these formats for compression and from teh tests i can see why. i would find it very useful if PA could support them, sorry i dont have more info about the formats tho.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-18-2005, 05:31 AM
TBGBe's Avatar
TBGBe TBGBe is offline
Still Mainly Lurking
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,151
Thanks: 6
Thanked 102 Times in 94 Posts
My thoughts:
Neither format is "free" for inclusion in other compression utilities. There is a license required for implementation (even though PAQ source is GPL).

Note:
regarding WinRk - according to their forum, they do not even allow uncompressing by other utilities (never mind compressing)!

regarding PAQ - so many variants (optimisations) which are incompatible, this is really a format just for experimentation.
__________________
Terry

WinXP SP3
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-18-2005, 07:06 PM
Malcolm Malcolm is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
WinRK format...

Quote:
Originally Posted by TBGBe
regarding WinRk - according to their forum, they do not even allow uncompressing by other utilities (never mind compressing)!
A more accurate way of saying that is that we do not yet provide a way for others to implement RK archive support.
This may change in the future, however our main focus at present is on providing the best archiver we can. (As a hint, WinRK 3 should provide some interesting developments in this regard...)

Quote:
Originally Posted by TBGBe
regarding PAQ - so many variants (optimisations) which are incompatible, this is really a format just for experimentation.
This is part of the reason we developed PWCM (and are currently developing the FPW family of codecs). The PAQ algorithms have great potential, but need more speed, format stability and usability.

Malcolm
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-19-2005, 05:07 AM
TBGBe's Avatar
TBGBe TBGBe is offline
Still Mainly Lurking
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,151
Thanks: 6
Thanked 102 Times in 94 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Malcolm
.. we do not yet provide a way for others to implement RK archive support.
...
The PAQ algorithms have great potential, but need more speed, format stability and usability.

Malcolm
I am not saying they are "bad" only that, as far as the original question is concerned (support within PowerArchiver) the answer is that neither is possible at present.
__________________
Terry

WinXP SP3
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-19-2005, 01:20 PM
davidsplash davidsplash is offline
PA Super User
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: london
Posts: 1,226
Thanks: 0
Thanked 29 Times in 26 Posts
more formats

if we are on about formats how about par

and not forgetting uha which in tests is better than 7zip
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.