I'm not disputing the 2012/2013 bit of course it would be 2012 if it was released this year, but if was around october you might as well make it beta 2013.
Again, it depends on at what point you are to make the choice. is pa at a point where you could release a major roll out.
Personally, PA works great as it is, i see no reason to rush development this year. unless its to resolve bugs i dont mind waiting till next year.
We have ZTE, Cloud and Wiki to keep us all busy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luxor
Maybe you should just call it PoweArchiver 13 and drop the 2000 part altogether.
|
I like that idea!! get rid of the year all togeather, why not make 2013 not only a modern improved version but rename the version to PowerArchiver 13.0
__________________
Regards,
Sir Richard
Cheshire (UK)
------------------------
MS Windows 8 Pro+MediaPack 64-bit
Intel Core i5 2520M @ 2.50GHz, 6.00GB RAM,
NVIDIA Geforce GT 520MX
And always the latest
Powerarchiver Toolbox