View Single Post
  #21  
Old 01-26-2011, 03:52 PM
spwolf's Avatar
spwolf spwolf is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 7,820
Thanks: 676
Thanked 207 Times in 192 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by gan View Post
Either way compression is a lot more time consuming so the most important part to improve. If i could pick 64 bit PA to get a bit faster compression, but also a bit slower extraction i would have picked that option.

I believe 64 bit Windows on the desktop really had a breakthrough with Vista and 7. A lot of people want 64 bit for the OS and then usually prefer native 64 bits applications as well even if they don't notice a difference compared to 32 bit. I guess it's not a matter of "if" a software company should have a 64 bit version, but but "when" it should happen since 64 bit obviously is the future. Some competitors are already there and i think PA should consider to do the same thing sooner instead of later.

-gan
well this is why the thread was started - to see if people want 64bit extraction of RARs even if it is slower than 32bit extraction of RARs and has no benefit except for being slower :-)
__________________
ConeXware, Inc.
latest PA release info on Facebook, Twitter | Follow us and win free PowerArchiver.
Reply With Quote