View Single Post
  #38  
Old 10-26-2010, 02:35 PM
Micke's Avatar
Micke Micke is offline
PA Super User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sweden
Posts: 131
Thanks: 11
Thanked 52 Times in 40 Posts
That's correct. From what I can see PACL 6.02 behave and stores the path exactly the same as PACL 6.01.

Now usually this is not a problem as long as the paths are different in the list file. In these test only the sharename is different resulting in a problem when the rest of the path is exactly the same.

Personally I would like to have a parameter when using PACOMP that says store the <machinename>\<sharename> in the path when creating archive. If the parameter isn't used, then the result would be as it is now without storing <machinename>\<sharename> in the path.

Kind Regards
Micke
The Following User Says Thank You to Micke For This Useful Post:
spwolf (10-26-2010)