View Single Post
  #17  
Old 03-15-2010, 09:26 AM
Badders Badders is offline
Senior Members
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 44
Thanks: 3
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Wow - so much interest

First of all, thanks for everyone's contributions and especially Micke for the script. I've downloaded it and it works fine for issue 2, "multiple rows in listfile":

Code:
E:\PACL6>ver

Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]

E:\PACL6>type pacl6prob.lst
\\DTTST03\Data\pacltest\*.*
\\DTRAH05\Data\pacltest\*.*

E:\PACL6>cscript pacl6probscript.vbs PACL6prob.zip PACL6prob.lst
Microsoft (R) Windows Script Host Version 5.7
Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

E:\PACL6\PACOMP.exe -a -r -p -k -c2 "PACL6prob.zip" "\\DTTST03\Data\pacltest\*.*
"
E:\PACL6\PACOMP.exe -a -r -p -k -c2 "PACL6prob.zip" "\\DTRAH05\Data\pacltest\*.*
"

E:\PACL6>paext -t PACL6prob.zip
PowerArchiver Command Line (PACL)              Version 6.01       [Feb 07 2010]
Copyright(c) 1999-2010 ConeXware, Inc.  All Rights Reserved. Registered Version
This product is licensed to: Decision Systems Ltd
Archive Extr.---ZIP,ZIPX,7Z,CAB,LHA,ARJ,RAR,ACE,TAR,GZ,BZ2,UUE,ZOO,B64,YENC,...
  Internet: http://www.powerarchiver.com  Email: support@conexware.com

Archive --> E:\PACL6\PACL6prob.zip [ZIP]

  testing: pacltest\F1\FILE1.TXT  --> OK [25%]
  testing: pacltest\F1\FILE2.TXT  --> OK [50%]
  testing: pacltest\F2\FILE3.TXT  --> OK [75%]
  testing: pacltest\F2\FILE4.TXT  --> OK [100%]
  testing: pacltest\  --> OK [100%]
  testing: pacltest\F1\  --> OK [100%]
  testing: pacltest\F2\  --> OK [100%]

E:\PACL6>
Regarding the second, and more important, issue for me, I'd be happy with an option to store the machine & share names. Options are good

I guess we'll have to agree to disagree on whether a developers "tidying up", affecting functionality of the product, is right. If other users are reporting it as a bug then a decision has to be made, one way or the other - which is what's happened. Unfortunately, this time, I was at the wrong end of the decision.

Regarding a refund? I don't one. I think I've had real value for money from PACL and wish to contribute to it's continued development. Version 6 does offer so much more (as you say) and I like the way coneXware operates. I do feel a little guilty that I didn't test the version 6 beta as these issues would have surfaced much earlier.

Keep up the good work guys and here's looking forward to 6.02. Let me know if I can help with testing etc.

Badders
The Following User Says Thank You to Badders For This Useful Post:
spwolf (03-15-2010)